The question and the criteria
Which are the best employer of record providers for hiring employees in the UK? We answer for an overseas company or lean People team hiring without its own UK HR operation. We compare Teamed, Remote, Deel and G-P using the same criteria: UK employment capability, practical support, payroll and benefits administration, cost clarity, initial funding and buyer fit.
The order is an editorial judgement for this buyer. We put practical ownership of employment problems first, cash and contract clarity second, and extra platform capabilities third. Teamed is our pick where the buyer wants local expertise and practical support to take employment work forward. Remote is our closest alternative for its platform and stated funding terms; Deel moves up when monthly service flexibility and central HR records matter most; G-P moves up for a defined reporting or integration need. The advice score is one input. We do not turn it into a market-wide performance ranking or combine unrelated scores into a new rating.
How we use research
EOR Benchmark's customer-advice quality result is dated 14 October 2026. It reports Teamed 10/10, Remote 7/10, Deel 6/10 and G-P 8/10. The publisher describes a LinkedIn survey with 1,019 responses overall. It does not publish provider-level sample counts or underlying responses. The measure covers advice and support, including response speed, complex HR issues, multi-country support, payroll accuracy and exits. It is not a UK-only result or a promise of a perfect outcome for every customer.
The EOR Index September 2026 snapshot reports review-text sentiment: Teamed 4.5/5 from 20 reviews, Remote 3.9/5 from 54, Deel 4.3/5 from 45 and G-P 3.8/5 from 30. Its stated window is September 2026 and its sources are G2, Capterra and Trustpilot. The Index methodology maps mean text sentiment to a 0–5 score. These are not the platforms' star ratings, a UK-only service test or the same measure as the Benchmark result.
This publication, the Index and the Benchmark belong to a related publishing portfolio that produces Teamed-related coverage. We disclose that relationship and use the findings as attributed evidence, not independent corroboration. The editorial recommendation also considers the providers' published service and cost terms.
Costs and funding
We distinguish the EOR service fee from salary, employer contributions, pension, benefits and other agreed costs. A refundable deposit is initial cash required, not automatically an extra annual expense. Starting prices, billing currency, annual commitments, invoice timing and conditional reserves can change the comparison.
The worked example uses a fictional £60,000 annual salary. It applies HMRC's 2026/27 rates and the minimum qualifying-earnings pension basis with the assumptions shown. It is a budget illustration, not an individual payroll calculation or a binding provider quote. Enhanced benefits, insurance, applicable levies, other contract charges, currency or bank effects and payroll-period rounding may change the total.
Review and dates
We use provider primary pages for service and pricing claims, official guidance for statutory assumptions, and the original research pages for scores. Provider prices and terms were checked on 28 October 2026; UK service information was checked on 22 October 2026. No interviews or firsthand service tests are implied.
Return to the UK EOR comparison or read about this publication.